A declaration
JudgeMe 9 is a declaration for a new way to hold a trial: justice that is fast, accessible and objective, that never leans toward the stronger side, and is built on the wisdom of many lawyers.
Justice built on the wisdom of lawyers
Today
A simple case drags on for years. Nobody knows the cost in advance. The outcome hangs on one judge, on one morning. And the side with more money and more lawyers can wear the other down until it gives up.
The declaration
The panel is anonymous. The lawyers see the parties; the parties cannot see them, and no lawyer knows who else sits on the panel. No pressure, no backroom persuasion, no intimidation. Their fee is set in advance, whoever wins.
Not one judge, but a panel of lawyers from the case's field. Each one questions, weighs and rules independently, and the system unites their rulings into one verdict. Several independent minds err less than one.
The hearing happens on video, the cost is known upfront, and the verdict arrives in weeks, not years. Either side may appeal to a new, larger panel.
How it works
The parties file the claim, name its field (employment, family, commercial, torts) and the compensation they seek.
By the size of the case and the budget, choose how many lawyers sit and at what rating. Three at minimum. The cost is fixed in advance.
Lawyers from the case's field are invited to judge. They sign a confidentiality agreement and recuse themselves if they have any tie to either party.
On video. The lawyers see and ask; the parties answer without knowing who faces them. The system manages the right to speak and presents the documents.
Each lawyer reads the file and issues a ruling of their own, alone, without knowing what the others decided.
The system unites the rulings, weighted by rating, into a final verdict. The lawyers then read their colleagues' rulings and reasoning, to learn and grow.
An example
Divorce · parenting time, child support and property
| Lawyer | Parenting time | Support / month | Property |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lawyer 1 | Open access | 1,200 | 18,000 |
| Lawyer 2 | Twice a week | 1,500 | 18,000 |
| Lawyer 3 | Every weekend | 1,400 | 16,000 |
| Lawyer 4 | Pickup from home | 1,900 | 45,000 |
| Lawyer 5 | Open access | 1,200 | 18,000 |
| Lawyer 6 | Open access | 1,350 | 19,000 |
| Lawyer 7 | Pickup from home | 1,900 | 19,000 |
| The weighted verdict | Partial custody | 1,750 | 28,000 |
An illustration from the JudgeMe 9 founding deck (2020). Each dot marks the lawyer's rating; the final verdict weighs them all.
Who it's for
Couples who prefer “mediation with a ruling” to a courtroom.
Contracts that state in advance: in a dispute, JudgeMe 9 decides.
When the employer agrees to a preliminary ruling, or the employment contract says so.
Claims against insurers, municipalities and corporations, where the citizen stands at a disadvantage.
Advice for one side or both: what the wisdom of lawyers thinks of the case, before going further.
Two sides of the same justice
The path
A closed circle of lawyers in one field, monitored hearing rooms and review by a senior team.
More fields of law, and lawyers with no geographic limit.
JudgeMe 9 as a standing part of arbitration between companies and their customers.
The online hearing as a legally binding process in suitable cases, and from there, the world.
The declaration
We believe justice should not be a luxury.
That no one should lose only because the other side is stronger.
And that the wisdom of many is more just than the power of one.
Join the first circle: citizens, lawyers and organizations who want to see the new way come to life.